IN THE FUTURE, THE JOKE GOES,
airliners will each have a pilot and a dog.
The dog will be there to bite the pilot if he
touches the controls, and the pilot will be
there to feed the dog. It’s no joke, though,
when NASA scientists begin entertaining
the idea of replacing the copilot with a
wideband connection to a ground controller.
Who will take over the plane should the pilot
become incapacitated? Nor is it a joke to
carry the argument to its logical conclusion and do away with the
pilot
altogether.
It’s
a beguiling vision.
An
autonomous airplane
reliable
enough to be
trusted
by passengers
and
air-safety regulators
could
save not just on
salaries
but also on the cost
of
managing the glitchprone
minuet
by which
well-rested
flight crews
are
united with the planes
they’re
supposed to fly.
That
logistical problem
will
get harder as the
pilot
shortage worsens,
and
it will be hardest
of
all for short-hop air
service,
where the pilot-topassenger
ratio
is high.
Now
comes a slew of
startups
that propose to
serve
that very niche with
tiny,
autonomous aircraft.
Most
would be powered
by
electricity, use multiple
propellers
or ducted fans,
take
off vertically or nearly
so,
and range perhaps a
few
tens of kilometers.
Vahana,
a tilt-wing,
autonomous
air taxi that’s
been
developed by Airbus’s
Silicon
Valley outfit, A3, is
supposed
to begin testing
later
this year. The German
company
e-Volo, already
known
for lofting a pilot in
an
elaborate multicopter,
says
it’s gearing up to make
an
autonomous version.
Zee
Aero, reportedly
personally
funded by
Google
cofounder Larry
Page,
offers another
example,
and Uber yet
another.
And Terrafugia,
a
veteran in the flyingcar
space—at
last, a
proper
use for that bit of biz lingo!—is also
talking
about
making a model
that’s
autonomous.
When
so many new
startups
are pursuing the
same
goal, it’s tempting
to
think there must be
something
there. But
hope
springs eternal in
tech
land, and so does the
propensity
to promise big.
All
these companies have
proven
tight-lipped (not
one
returned inquiries
from
IEEE Spectrum),
which
suggests that there
might
be less here than
meets
the eye.
Spectrum reported
on
Terrafugia,
the one company
that
has a real history,
back
in 2007, in our
January
special issue.
We
called the company
a
“loser” for describing
a
flying car it said it was
about
to bring to market.
It
didn’t happen.
“It
can be done—we could
be
flying around in pilotless
planes,
just as we
could
be living on cities on
Mars—but
is it worth the
cost
and the effort?” asks
Patrick
Smith, author of
the
Ask the Pilot column,
which
ran for years in
Salon magazine. “I fly
airplanes
for a living, and
my
jaw drops when I hear
people
say that flying is
already
mostly automated.
Even
the most ‘automated’
flight
is still subject to so
much
human input and
subjective
decisions.”
So
why then are all
these
startups starting
up?
“It’d be a novelty, not
necessarily
meant even
for
profit, but as a way to
prove
and build the technology,”
Smith
suggests.
And
should one of these
outfits
ever offer seats to
the
paying public, would
you
entrust your life to
a
robotic pilot? “People
want
a pilot in the cockpit,
to
know there’s someone
in
charge who shares
their
fate,” says Missy
Cummings,
a former U.S.
Navy
fighter pilot, now a
professor
of mechanical
engineering
and materials
science
at Duke University.
“I
don’t think we’ll ever
have
a passenger airliner
be
a drone—there will
always
be some version
of
a Captain James T. Kirk
on
board.” But, she adds,
things
are different for
hops
of, say, 50 miles
(80
kilometers), where
for
some people, at
least,
convenience might
outweigh
fear.
“It’s
technologically
achievable
in the near
term;
as for the regulatory
problem,
I think we’ll
see
it in China first,”
Cummings
says. “Ehang
[in
Guangzhou, China]
is
supposedly doing a test
in
March.”
The
company claims
that
its roboplane has
already
carried a passenger,
and
if it performs the
feat
in public, we’ll let you
know. And if it
doesn’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment